« Ghost towns and what not | Main | Old news »

August 01, 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451903f69e2014e8a4d9e5d970d

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vaccines and summer reading:

Comments

1. I agree with you on vaccines. My dad had polio as a child. It enrages me when people are all 'those diseases don't exist anymore... shrug.'

2. If you liked Graceling, read Fire! Same author, some of the same characters, seriously awesome.

 Got Fire during my last library trip! Totally going to read it! (but it wont give me any bingo squares so Im trying to focus :)

Little Bee is readable and probably listenable. Not the best book ever, but definitely worth it for the win! (Competitive book reading- I like it!)

I still can't get through Jane Eyre; not a fast summer read for me. Little Bee was good. I'm enjoying The Help, which you have probably already read.
Thanks for vaccinating Oscar.
Hope you beat Biscuit!

I feel like, in all respect, including a counterpoint as I happen to be a parent that has declined 2 of the newer vaccines for my child. Rotovirus and Chicken Pox. Parents like me are not declining all vaccines like a couple people are stating. For me it's the ones that haven't been around long enough to really 'test' the outcome like chicken pox. As well as ones that are unnecessary like the rotovirus, which is taken orally, since my child isn't in daycare around other kids so him getting sick and dehydrated, etc. from other kid germs was non existant. Each parent can do and decide whatever they think is best for their child and I would never judge anyone on their decision. I know I felt it when I declined them from the nurses, definetly but really they have to know I wouldn't unknowingly decline something that would help my kid if I didn't have reliable sources and studies to back up my concerns. For me what it comes down to, is that if there is any debate about any of these topics, I would rather see the researchers prove it one way or another before changing the way schedules use to be, or creating new vaccines and administering them before conducting lonterm studies on the effects. I hope this helps to clarify again just the 'other side' on this debate. My hope that this comment is received in absolutely no ill will or negatively. My hope is that everyone can always look rationally and intellectually at both sides. :)

Hi Jeannie,
thanks for your thoughtful reply. I can more understand your situation on declining newer vaccines (esp rotovirus if your kid is not going to be in daycare as mine is). Still, part of me thinks the only way we can determine efficacy of newer vaccines if for lots of kids to try them. Assuming theyre deemed safe by fda etc Im not too worried about adverse affects, its not a perfect system but Id rather my very healthy child get the vaccine and hopefully prevent a child who cant get the vaccine (ie a child with a immune disorder) from getting the illness and having a very serious case of what would be a moderate illness for healthy kids.

Anyway, the debate goes on. My main beef is with folks who still insist on the autism link even though its been thoroughly disproved and the original papers authors retracted it. Autism is certainly scary but not about vaccines.

Melissa

The comments to this entry are closed.

haworth handmade